Building New Schools
By Thomas M. Keane Jr.
Boston City Councilor
Published in the Back Bay Courant, June 9, 1998
Boston has 127 public schools. Eleven of them are pilot schools. The brightest lights in the city's educational firmament, pilot schools have captured the imagination of teachers, parents and most importantly, students. But pilot schools are in trouble for a seemingly odd reason: they can't find space.
Most city schools are governed centrally, with common curricula, funding and ways of doing things. Pilot schools are decentralized. They are governed by local boards composed of teachers, parents and community organizers. They set their own curricula, hours and standards.
Pilot schools should be the wave of the future. But that wave is crashing against some high rocks and there is much concern that the pilot school movement may be slowing down.
Most, if not all, of Boston's pilot schools face space problems. A quick rundown:
Beyond these imminent problems, the school system faces an even larger issue: new pilot schools are essentially on hold because space can't be found.
How did this mess occur? When pilot schools were first devised, it was thought that existing schools in established buildings should become pilot schools. With the exceptions of the Josiah Quincy School and the Lyndon Elementary that has not occurred. The city did not expect to see new schools being created and never planned on the need to create new buildings.
The solution? Part of the answer is to devote more resources to building or acquiring new school buildings. But the real solution is to begin to insist that existing schools themselves become pilot schools. Accomplishing this will be a tough task: it may mean targeting schools for shut down so that new pilot schools can be created.
It's a politically treacherous course. But meaningful educational reform in Boston means taking risks. Spend some time in a pilot school. You'll quickly find that these are schools worthy of taking such a risk.