Tom Menino needs a good challenger
23 February 2001
Mayor Thomas Menino's mayoralty is in trouble. The best thing that could happen to him this year is that someone challenges his bid for a third term.
That's a claim that undoubtedly would puzzle Menino and his campaign advisers. Menino's mayoralty appears to have been an enormous success. He consistently enjoys high popularity ratings, the kind that would make any politician envious.
Moreover, after winning his first race in 1993, Menino had no opponent when he ran for a second term. Even now, just seven months from the preliminary election for a third term, only two potential candidates - Councilors Mickey Roache and Peggy Davis-Mullen - have floated their names. Yet neither has any significant money and the common belief is that either would be just a sacrificial lamb.
If so, that's a shame. Because the truth is that Menino's second term has been aimless and lackluster. It's hard to figure out his vision for the city. On top of that, the mayor seems to be losing his political clout.
Why? There was no race for mayor in 1997. Should there be no race, or a weak race, in 2001, Menino's third term could be disastrous.
Elections are the means by which we think through issues. Having made decisions about those issues, voters confer upon the victor the power to implement those choices.
Menino's first election in 1993 - arguably
one of
Menino's victory, along with the election of a
And since then? In 1997, when he was unopposed, Menino never had to rejustify himself. He never had to figure out what voters liked and disliked. He never received a mandate for his second term.
And it shows. The last four years have lacked the drama of the first term, with Menino functioning more like a caretaker than a leader. He suggests small ideas - classes to help new immigrants learn to speak English, money for job training - but his broad vision ("build on our success") is vague and unfocused. The urban mechanic seems to be just tinkering.
And the nature of Menino's political power has changed. To be sure, the mayor still has the power to stop things. But his ability to create coalitions and accomplish things has diminished.
Compare, for example,
Four years later, a similarly high-profile task - finding a new home for the Red Sox - has proved far less tractable. Menino has encountered roadblocks at every turn. Opposition within the council and from residents has mounted and seems to have caught the administration unawares. Plans for the new park seem in disarray. Rather than dictating events, Menino appears to be responding to them.
Indeed, whether it's negotiating the teachers' contract,
trying to develop the
The cure? A real election, with a tough opponent and a genuine engagement of ideas. It would force Menino to figure out an agenda for himself and the city. It would give him the political strength to achieve those goals.
Sounds like a great scenario to me. Although there is, of course, one small problem.
Menino could lose.