Kudos for Menino's quest for privacy
by Thomas Keane, Jr.
The latest outrage from the Menino administration? The mayor tried to go to the doctor
in secret.
Good for
him.
Last Thursday Tom Menino
checked into the hospital to get a ``growth'' removed from his back. (Some
speculate the growth was House Speaker Thomas Finneran; others think it was the
entire City Council.)
The long-scheduled operation
wasn't on Menino's schedule. When word leaked out, the administration provided
few details. Given that this was the usually dull Fourth of July weekend and
there was little else to talk about, the surgery
erupted into a mini-scandal. The story, mind you, wasn't that Menino was ill.
Rather, it was that he tried to keep it private.
That marks a change in
policy by the mayor, and a welcome one at that. In March 1995 and then in
January 1997, Menino checked into Brigham and Women's Hospital for the removal
of some kidney stones. To say that the procedure involved is both personal and
painful is an understatement.
Still, the mayor was open
about everything, allowing his doctors to brief the press and disclosing
step-by-step what was going on.
And he paid for it. The mayoral kidney
stones were the subject of at least 40 newspaper stories and vastly more bad
jokes. There were comparisons of Menino to the kidney-shaped Frog Pond,
discussion of him ``passing'' on a stadium for the Patriots and when then-Gov.
Paul Cellucci came down with the same condition, Menino was described as giving
``stoney support.'' The press even held a kidney stone watch, gleefully noting
in February 1997 that it had finally passed.
Humiliating,
belittling stuff.
Just the kind of stuff, Menino now says, that ``keeps people out of politics.''
Menino may be tilting at
windmills here. Where once we regarded the personal lives of politicians -
including health and sexual matters - as unsuitable for public consumption,
now, it appears, everything is fair game. I think that line was crossed when a
17-year-old on MTV asked newly elected President Bill Clinton, ``Is it boxers and briefs?''
In what was one of the
stupidest moves ever by an otherwise savvy politician,
And a few years later, when he was
impeached and almost convicted for denying he had an affair,
The
And that's a bad thing. Partly it's bad
because it turns many otherwise decent people off to the idea of public
service. But more importantly, it conflates politics
and celebrity. Politicians become just another version of actors and pop
singers. And when politicians indulge in that cult of
celebrity, too often their personal lives become the tool by which their
political accomplishments and beliefs are destroyed. The proof of that, of
course, is the Monica Lewinsky mess. It had nothing to do with running the
country, but provided Republicans the opportunity to nearly bring down a
president and largely undermine his last two years in office.
That's not to say that there
are no circumstances where a pol's personal life can become relevant. For
certain high offices, a life-threatening health matter plainly becomes a
legitimate public issue. (Although in the case of Menino, life-threatening
issues mostly are of concern to the 13 city councilors, all of whom are
plotting how to succeed the man they regard as mayor for life.)
Moreover, politicians, like
all public figures, can sometimes serve as valuable object lessons. Sen. John
Kerry used his recent prostate cancer surgery, for example, to encourage other
men to get themselves screened. Still, such a role
should be a voluntary decision, not one we force upon politicians simply by
dint of them holding office.
It turns out Menino's effort
to keep some privacy failed - otherwise, to be frank, this column wouldn't be
appearing. But his effort to draw some sort of line is
commendable. I don't need to know about his growths, whether he uses sunscreen
or if he takes his vitamins once a day. In a week where a 3-year-old girl was paralyzed from an errant bullet, we should be worrying
about things that are more important.
Talk back to Tom Keane at